How
can these people live in such a cold temperature and still be joyful and
smiley? – was my first question after watching the documentary. As the
filmmaker narrates himself: “The sterility of the soul and the rigor of the
climate no other race could survive; yet here, utterly dependent upon animal
life, which is their sole source of food, live the most cheerful people in all
the world – the fearless, lovable, happy-go-lucky Eskimo” (2:57-3:19). Indeed, the
Eskimos seem quite proud and content with their way of life and it would be
arguable whether they would like to live somewhere else.
What
caught my attention was the labor division between genders: while males were building
igloos, hunting, trading and bringing the food to the family, women were taking
care of the igloos from the inside, looking after the children and helping their
husbands to get ready for the hunting. Furthermore, the specific sequence in
which the mother (Nyla) and the baby are playing with the baby husky illustrates
the relationship between the Eskimo mother and her child. Firstly, it was surprising to me that the
child was sitting fully naked at such a low temperature. Nevertheless, this is
how the Eskimos acclimatize to northern Canadian weather. The scene gives us an
idea of Eskimo child’s upbringing practices. Aside from adapting to the
climate, the Eskimos become friends with the huskies, which later in their life
helps them with hunting and transportation. Nanook, along with his family, is also
responsible for his dogs. In one of the scenes, the filmmaker shows us that Nanook
makes one smaller igloo for the puppies to keep them warm and safe at night.
The filmmaker uses different camera angles to
portray the life of the Eskimos. In the sequence, he firstly shows us the overall
process of the barter – Nanook, the trader and other Eskimos showing each other
their products. Later, the camera focuses on the woman, child and the puppies. Furthermore,
the camera comes closer to the dog and the baby, making them the central focus
of the sequence.
While
we can’t hear the Eskimos’ voices in the documentary, we can understand the
filmmaker’s reactions to the scenes by the music he is using in different sequences.
The music becomes more joyful when Nanook puts baby huskies on the pelt. Later,
the music gets more harmonious to accentuate the purity and innocence of a
child playing with the puppies. It is also noteworthy that the filmmaker narrates
the story both – in a visual and written way by inserting notes between the
scenes. While these cuts help the viewer to better understand the Eskimo
lifestyle, it also illustrates the filmmaker’s authorship and the way he sees
the Eskimos.
Robert
Flaherty’s documentary is rich with ethnographic data and it can be analyzed through
different sociological and anthropological theoretical lenses. It would be
particularly interesting for me to make a comparative analysis of Eskimo life in
1922 and now in relation to climate change and see how their daily practices have
changed throughout the past decades. For this comparison, Flaherty’s film would
serve as crucial ethnographic data.
Comments
Post a Comment